Relying on wrench time or even broader productive time as a key performance metric for improvement initiatives is fundamentally flawed. The limitations of wrench time as a reliable metric become apparent as soon as one attempts to measure it accurately.
Challenges of Measuring Wrench Time
To initiate a wrench time improvement project, organisations must first establish a reliable baseline for their current wrench time. However, accurately determining this baseline is notoriously difficult for several reasons:
- Measurement Complexity: Wrench time refers to the amount of time technicians spend physically working on tools or equipment. However, determining this time with precision requires comprehensive observation, time-tracking, or sophisticated monitoring systems, all of which can be prohibitively expensive and labour-intensive.
- Cost and Labour Intensity: Implementing effective tracking mechanisms often involves hiring additional personnel, installing costly monitoring devices, or disrupting workflows to collect accurate data. These efforts can significantly outweigh any potential gains from minor improvements in wrench time.
- Lack of Actionable Insights: Even if wrench time is accurately measured, an increase in this metric only indicates that technicians are spending more time actively working. It offers no assurance that the work being performed is productive, valuable, or aligned with strategic objectives.
The Misconception of Focusing on Wrench Time
Improving wrench time does not necessarily correlate with improved performance or productivity. It merely increases the time technicians spend using tools, without ensuring that they are doing the right work or addressing the most critical issues. This emphasis can inadvertently encourage technicians to focus on quantity over quality, leading to inefficiencies or even misaligned priorities.
A More Effective Approach: Reframing the Objective
Rather than fixating on increasing wrench time, organisations should adopt a more practical and impactful objective:
“We want to get more work done with the existing resources.”
This subtle yet powerful reframing shifts the focus away from mere time-on-tools toward achieving tangible, measurable improvements in overall work execution efficiency. By concentrating on outcomes rather than activities, organisations can leverage their existing metrics to drive meaningful progress.
Leveraging Existing Metrics for Benchmarking
This approach allows for benchmarking against existing, reliable metrics that are already integral to performance measurement frameworks. Instead of struggling to track wrench time, organisations can gauge efficiency improvements through the following indicators:
- Average Weekly Schedule Attainment: Is this metric trending upward, indicating that more planned work is being completed consistently?
- 6-Month Trended Preventative Maintenance (PM) Strategy Compliance: Is there a sustained improvement in adherence to preventative maintenance schedules?
- 6-Month Trended Corrective Maintenance (CM) Compliance: Is compliance with corrective maintenance schedules improving over time?
- Volume of Deferred Work: Is the volume of deferred work trending downward, suggesting that critical tasks are being completed more effectively?
- Maintenance Backlog: Is the overall backlog of maintenance tasks declining, indicating improved throughput and resource utilisation?
By using these real-world metrics, organisations can confirm that improvements are not only enhancing work execution efficiency but also ensuring that more of the right work is being completed. This approach provides clearer, more actionable insights and a direct link between improvement efforts and organisational performance.
#SRCN/Articles